Is Buddhism a religion or a philosophy?

    +5  Views: 2136 Answers: 7 Posted: 8 years ago

    7 Answers

    It can be both. I've know many, many Buddhist and the last Buddhist crowd I was in was for a funeral, all chanting IN unison and saying personal prayers for Chris. That makes it a religion for me but then Jim (the ONE you met) is a Buddhist, always posting about the ways of thought. Philosophy.....

    It's the closest thing to any "religion" that I believe in.


    Can you elaborate a little, Tommy?

    See Roy's answer.It's a philosophy I believe in.(These days).

    I was actually asking to get personal thoughts. I can look up stuff almost as well as the next guy! You've referred to it as religion AND philosophy. It's interesting.

    No it's not a religion.It's "THE CLOSEST THING" to a religion that I believe in.

    OK! I'll not push at you; this is personal stuff and I respect that and you. :D

    It is neither a religion in the sense in which that word is commonly understood, for it is not "a system of faith and worship owing any allegiance to a supernatural being."

    Buddhism does not demand blind faith from its adherents. Here mere belief is dethroned and is substituted by confidence based on knowledge, which, in Pali, is known as saddha. The confidence placed by a follower on the Buddha is like that of a sick person in a noted physician, or a student in his teacher. A Buddhist seeks refuge in the Buddha because it was he who discovered the path of deliverance. 

    A Buddhist does not seek refuge in the Buddha with the hope that he will be saved by his (i.e. the Buddha's own) personal purification. The Buddha gives no such guarantee. It is not within the power of a Buddha to wash away the impurities of others. One could neither purify nor defile another. The Buddha, as teacher, instructs us, but we ourselves are directly responsible for our purification. Although a Buddhist seeks refuge in the Buddha, he does not make any self-surrender. Nor does a Buddhist sacrifice his freedom of thought by becoming a follower of the Buddha. He can exercise his own free will and develop his knowledge even to the extent of becoming a Buddha himself. 

    The starting point of Buddhism is reasoning or understanding, or, in the Pali words,samma-ditthi. 

    To the seekers of truth the Buddha says: 

    "Do not accept anything on (mere) hearsay -- (i.e., thinking that thus have we heard it for a long time). Do not accept anything by mere tradition -- (i.e., thinking that it has thus been handed down through many generations). Do not accept anything on account of mere rumors -- (i.e., by believing what others say without any investigation). Do not accept anything just because it accords with your scriptures. Do not accept anything by mere suppositions. Do not accept anything by mere inference. Do not accept anything by merely considering the reasons. Do not accept anything merely because it agrees with your pre-conceived notions. Do not accept anything merely because it seems acceptable -- (i.e., thinking that as the speaker seems to be a good person his words should be accepted). Do not accept anything thinking that the ascetic is respected by us (therefore it is right to accept his word). 

    "But when you know for yourselves -- these things are immoral, these things are blameworthy, these things are censured by the wise, these things, when performed and undertaken conduce to ruin and sorrow -- then indeed do you reject them. 

    "When you know for yourselves -- these things are moral, these things are blameless, these things are praised by the wise, these things, when performed and undertaken, conduce to well-being and happiness -- then do you live acting accordingly." 

    These inspiring words of the Buddha still retain their original force and freshness. 

    Though there is no blind faith, one might argue whether there is no worshipping of images etc., in Buddhism. 

    Buddhists do not worship an image expecting worldly or spiritual favors, but pay their reverence to what it represents. 
    An understanding Buddhist, in offering flowers and incense to an image, designedly makes himself feel that he is in the presence of the living Buddha and thereby gains inspiration from his noble personality and breathes deep his boundless compassion. He tries to follow the Buddha's noble example. 

    The Bo-tree is also a symbol of Enlightenment. These external objects of reverence are not absolutely necessary, but they are useful as they tend to concentrate one's attention. An intellectual person could dispense with them as he could easily focus his attention and visualize the Buddha. For our own good, and out of gratitude, we pay such external respect but what the Buddha expects from his disciple is not so much obeisance as the actual observance of his Teachings. The Buddha says -- "He honors me best who practices my teaching best." "He who sees the Dhamma sees me." 

    With regard to images, however, Count Kevserling remarks -- "I see nothing more grand in this world than the image of the Buddha. It is an absolutely perfect embodiment of spirituality in the visible domain." 

    Furthermore, it must be mentioned that there are no petitional or intercessory prayers in Buddhism. However much we may pray to the Buddha we cannot be saved. The Buddha does not grant favors to those who pray to him. Instead of petitional prayers there is meditation that leads to self-control, purification and enlightenment. Meditation is neither a silent reverie nor keeping the mind blank. It is an active striving. It serves as a tonic both to the heart and the mind. The Buddha not only speaks of the futility of offering prayers but also disparages a slave mentality. A Buddhist should not pray to be saved, but should rely on himself and win his freedom. 

    "Prayers take the character of private communications, selfish bargaining with God. It seeks for objects of earthly ambitions and inflames the sense of self. Meditation on the other hand is self-change." -- Sri Radhakrishnan. 

    In Buddhism there is not, as in most other religions, an Almighty God to be obeyed and feared. The Buddha does not believe in a cosmic potentate, omniscient and omnipresent. In Buddhism there are no divine revelations or divine messengers. A Buddhist is, therefore, not subservient to any higher supernatural power which controls his destinies and which arbitrarily rewards and punishes. Since Buddhists do not believe in revelations of a divine being Buddhism does not claim the monopoly of truth and does not condemn any other religion. But Buddhism recognizes the infinite latent possibilities of man and teaches that man can gain deliverance from suffering by his own efforts independent of divine help or mediating priests. 

    Buddhism cannot, therefore, strictly be called a religion because it is neither a system of faith and worship, nor "the outward act or form by which men indicate their recognition of the existence of a God or gods having power over their own destiny to whom obedience, service, and honor are due." 

    If, by religion, is meant "a teaching which takes a view of life that is more than superficial, a teaching which looks into life and not merely at it, a teaching which furnishes men with a guide to conduct that is in accord with this its in-look, a teaching which enables those who give it heed to face life with fortitude and death with serenity," or a system to get rid of the ills of life, then it is certainly a religion of religions.


    What do YOU think?

    More of a "belief" than a "faith", more to my way of thinking, not that I'm a Buddhist.

    I agree with you.

    For me it is philosophy.  If you visit Japan, it takes on the power of religion which is really quite beautiful. 

    ....guessing, religion.

    I think it is more of a philosophy than a religion,,i had a problem believing a God could save me from the gutter of alcoholism,,but he did,,it would be an even bigger problem if someone was to tell me the philosophy of Buddha,,however in the end,it is each to his own..>>>>>>>><<<<<<<...

    I would say more a philosophy. it's not really like religions, not in the same sense as our religions in the western world.

    Top contributors in Religion & Spirituality category

    Answers: 29 / Questions: 0
    Karma: 37150
    Answers: 366 / Questions: 0
    Karma: 31325
    Answers: 621 / Questions: 4
    Karma: 27960
    Answers: 361 / Questions: 0
    Karma: 27160
    > Top contributors chart

    Unanswered Questions

    Soi Cầu 247
    Answers: 0 Views: 4 Rating: 0
    Answers: 0 Views: 5 Rating: 0
    Answers: 0 Views: 10 Rating: 0
    Answers: 0 Views: 11 Rating: 0
    Answers: 0 Views: 13 Rating: 0
    > More questions...