When two countries each have nuclear weapons, the probability of a direct war between them greatly decreases, but the probability of minor or indirect conflicts between them increases.
Like Vietnam and Korea, they were small conflicts between the two super-powers, Russia and the U.S.. Currently an example would be Pakistan and India.
Are you talking about the paradox of leaders that can not lead?
Your question is not a question?
or, A world full of heavily armed "terrorists" that have no weapons manufacturing facility?
This is a Simple Dialog Demo.
Mindblade16
leeroy
Roger Willcoe
