bafuphd
DID YOU THAT THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS HAS BEEN BREACHED IN FEDERAL COURTS?
Two Judges in Norhthern Florida stated on their written order: The Roys own property in an area that HISTORICALLY has been RACIALLY SEGREGATED. This is a strict defiance to the 1964 ACT. We are petitioning the High Court and Congress and we currently have three complaints pending. If you wish to join the petition, goe here: http://stophrs.blogspot.com
1 Answer
Jack Large
What makes you believe an area that HISTORICALLY HAD been RACIALLY SEGREGATED would have any relevance to conditions today? Past discrimination is irrelevant.
| 12 years ago. Rating: 0 | |
You haven't but if would ask my advice, I would suggest yor save your money, you will loose on appeal. IMO
By the way I'm black as well.
By the way I'm black as well.
Top contributors in Uncategorized category
Unanswered Questions
69WIN - Thiên Đường Cá Cược - Thưởng Lớn Nghìn Tỷ ?
Answers: 0
Views: 9
Rating: 0
CWIN
Answers: 0
Views: 5
Rating: 0
globalworkingfamiliesorg
Answers: 0
Views: 12
Rating: 0
KAKALIVE
Answers: 0
Views: 17
Rating: 0
xe-nang-thang-bang
Answers: 0
Views: 13
Rating: 0
LIVETHETHAO88 | LIVEBONGDA – Cập Nhật Tin Tức Thể Thao Nóng Hổi
Answers: 0
Views: 13
Rating: 0
1+1-6=?
Answers: 0
Views: 19
Rating: 0
redhotmerch940
> More questions...
Answers: 0
Views: 12
Rating: 0
We believe so for at least three distinct reasons:
a) because languistically speaking "Historically has been" does not mean "was" it means "continuing to be."
b) Because for no fault of ours, after stating such on the record, the Judges gave the white defendants who hurt us Carte Blanche to do so.
c) Everything on an order counts. What does this expression have to do with the order? Remember, Judges and Justices are scratching their heads over this rather complex statement.
Thanks for the imput