2 Answers
This is a complicated question and a very good one. Quite often situations evolve that when examiined seem to indicate a particular event or incident caused the situation to develop. That is causation. However, sometimes upon closer examination the evidence indicates that the origional reason thought to be the cause wasn't correct and that the event and the situation merely shared a relationship. Ocassionally, there are multiple relationships that share in the cause. The problem is that causation and correlation can be easily confused. For example, in global warming is man the cause of the problem or is there simply a relationship among many others. Man, I think I gave myself a headache.
14 years ago. Rating: 0 | |
Top contributors in Uncategorized category
Unanswered Questions
tk88oscom
Answers: 0
Views: 28
Rating: 0
Xóc Đĩa Online
Answers: 0
Views: 29
Rating: 0
Xóc Đĩa Online
Answers: 0
Views: 27
Rating: 0
hitclub43com
Answers: 0
Views: 31
Rating: 0
Xóc Đĩa Online
Answers: 0
Views: 28
Rating: 0
f168 Casino: Doi Thuong Cong Bang - Niem Tin
Answers: 0
Views: 32
Rating: 0
GALAXY77: Situs Slot Gampang Menang Paling Nikmat Tiada Tara
Answers: 0
Views: 37
Rating: 0
f168: Thanh dia giai tri ca cuoc toc do cao
> More questions...
Answers: 0
Views: 63
Rating: 0
I know, I don't how I managed to make such a convoluted explanation. I should have made it simple and said if two systems share a relationship but neither caused the other to evolve then it's correlation, but if one of the systems was responsible for the other being created or changed then it's causation.