1 Answer
The Winklevosses had claimed they were shortchanged in a $65 million settlement with Zuckerberg because Facebook had misrepresented the value of company stock. In April, a federal appeals judge rejected the argument and ruled the twins could not unwind the legally binding agreement they had signed in 2008.
The brothers and a third partner, Divya Narendra, had wanted to reverse that ruling and were willing to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. But in documents filed Wednesday with the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, they said they will not pursue the matter any longer.
The brothers and a third partner, Divya Narendra, had wanted to reverse that ruling and were willing to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. But in documents filed Wednesday with the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, they said they will not pursue the matter any longer.
| 14 years ago. Rating: 1 | |
Top contributors in Uncategorized category
Unanswered Questions
F8BET
Answers: 0
Views: 9
Rating: 0
rentzonealbania
Answers: 0
Views: 10
Rating: 0
ukgasplumberscom
Answers: 0
Views: 8
Rating: 0
ao88vncom
Answers: 0
Views: 12
Rating: 0
go88zzcom
Answers: 0
Views: 10
Rating: 0
Khuyến Mãi V9Bet
Answers: 0
Views: 17
Rating: 0
Unlock Your Certification Goals with Marks4Sure: Your Trusted Exam Preparation Partner
Answers: 0
Views: 19
Rating: 0
Unlock Your Certification Goals with Marks4Sure: Your Trusted Exam Preparation Partner
> More questions...
Answers: 0
Views: 16
Rating: 0
Sandra942
6dogs4us
Best answer!