In the days of the original 6 NHL, the playoff format involved first place vs. third and second vs fourth. Looking back, that structure now seems absurd since you reward the second place finisher the luxury of playing the weakest playoff qualifier. And why finish third when finishing fourth is more advantageous?! Any thoughts as to the rationale of this format?
1 Answer
I was never aware of this format, but it does sound absurd. In thuse days it was important that the Canadiens had the top Guns. Maybe the league felt obligated to balance this out in some way. I must admit, I get tired of hearing about all those championships Montreal won. Think about it, they had a one in six chance of winning the championship befor the season even started and four out of six were guaranteed a playoff spot.
| 15 years ago. Rating: 0 | |
Top contributors in Hockey category
Unanswered Questions
bongdavietnam
Answers: 0
Views: 3
Rating: 0
pgslotyou
Answers: 0
Views: 3
Rating: 0
Nova Patti – Features, Gameplay Experience & User Feedback
Answers: 0
Views: 8
Rating: 0
w88zorocomz
Answers: 0
Views: 7
Rating: 0
88clbdevcom
Answers: 0
Views: 16
Rating: 0
Sunwin Download Link – Fast and Secure Access to the Gaming Platform
Answers: 0
Views: 11
Rating: 0
Cách bảo trì tháp giải nhiệt nước Tashin để tăng tuổi thọ
Answers: 0
Views: 10
Rating: 0
7m - Tỷ Số Bóng Đá Trực Tuyến, Kết Quả Và Lịch Thi Đấu Mới Nhất
> More questions...
Answers: 0
Views: 14
Rating: 0
magclara15
kelozin