5 Answers

For THIS item, the bolts should be THIS type and THIS big.

For THAT item, get THAT type THAT big.

 

10 years ago. Rating: 5
Comment this answer Add new comment

Oh you silly people,the item is obviously a "wigwam for a gooses bridle",i thought everyone knew that,???.

10 years ago. Rating: 3
Comment this answer Add new comment

What about the nuts? --For the bolts? Should they match?

10 years ago. Rating: 3
Comment this answer Add new comment

Technically, the watch remains as cutting link edge as its overall design. The movement uses an entirely in-house regulation system. The balance link is in titanium and white gold, and it was the subject of link a 2016 patent. The flat balance spring's terminal curve is protected by a 2006 patent and the "pare-shock" antishock system by a patent dating back to 2005. In titanium, the DB28XP retails for $79,000.

2 months ago. Rating: 0
Comment this answer Add new comment

I find it deeply difficult to wrap my head around any argument link that claims this watch doesn't look like a 1655 Explorer. Sure, I can concede a few points like the dial differences. The link OG Explorer II presented about as unique a dial design as you're likely to find on any Rolex watch outside of a Paul Newman Daytona. Almost none of the classic link Rolex hallmarks are evident on that watch outside of the brand name and logo.

8 months ago. Rating: 0
Comment this answer Add new comment