close
    Is Sarah Palin off her rocker or is she right?

    Former Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin has warned that the federal government is “stockpiling bullets” in preparation for “civil unrest,” adding that America is “finished” if it cannot deal with its debt problem. - 


    “If we are going to wet our proverbial pants over 0.3% in annual spending cuts when we’re running up trillion dollar annual deficits, then we’re done. Put a fork in us. We’re finished. We’re going to default eventually and that’s why the feds are stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”  


    "" 


    …The Department of Homeland Security has committed to purchasing around 2 billion bullets over the course of the last year, in addition to buying 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles last September (the agency referred to them as “personal defense weapons”).


    Although the mainstream media has played down the purchases as the feds merely saving money by buying in bulk, the ammo buys have contributed to shortages across the country.


    - See more at: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/03/sarah-palin-government-is-stockpiling-bullets-in-case-of-civil-unrest/#sthash.H8vCKP3O.dpuf 


    _________________________________________________________


    They can't find a way of getting the guns away from the people, so they are spending billions to buy the ammo so there is none on the shelves for the general public.  


    These are the actions of a tyrannical government with a tyrannical leader. 


    Or maybe Sarah Palin is just plain crazy and the rest of the people are just seeing things when they go to buy ammo and there is none.  


    ""

    +1  Views: 882 Answers: 3 Posted: 11 years ago

    3 Answers

    Maybe she just comes across as a dummy, but I think that she is more than a ditzy figure..  The Republicans saw something in her to have her running back in '08, I guess...

    Colleen

    Moderator
    Sometimes it's the ditsy ones who have the most information. People share with them thinking they don't understand.

    It would be nice to end all need for protection, but then there would be no fences, dirt and gold would have equal value and there would be no secrets. Curious how things that diminish the value of our commonwealth can be so divisive. 

    Colleen

    Moderator
    Huh? Are you side stepping? This is not about protecting the American people.
    robertgrist

    There are several interesting views to “protection”. If I deny the populous access to my addictive product after having addicted everyone at a very low price, to raise the price, some will accept the higher price and those who cannot afford the price hike will suffer withdrawals, and seek funds to afford their more costly habit to every extreme toward their goal. Thus the need for protection of the dope mother-load. Weighing this little analogy in analysis of all forms of wants, needs, protection and violent seizures…I would not call what I said was" side stepping” but stepping forward directly into the most central and defining essence of a “need for arms”. Of course that also implies that something is at risk of being lost without all those bullets. What could that be?
    The threat of potential conflict is born of uncertainty and fear on condition that the economy magically disappears and assumes that the Public will panic, riot and descend into chaos requiring some form of marshal law to restore faith beyond bread lines amid the “Hunger Games” scenario.
    I am quite sure we can handle our problems better than that…and are on just such a better path already.
    Colleen

    Moderator
    I see no evidence of a better path. I see president doing everything he can to get in the way of a better path being created. When the idea of martial law has to be looked and and addressed to this degree, then that is a clear sign and uprising or revolt is at hand. He just released 10,000 illegal aliens back into the population. Let's see where that leads and how many will suddenness end up with guns and go on shooting sprees to get those commodities they can not afford. There is a clear plan to his madness. I'm still dumbfounded that people can not see it.

    For one thing, Your probably the one off there rocker.  If you can't under stand what a budget is, and the cost of not paying your debt.  May be you need to go to Vegas not pay your debt and see what they would do to you.     

    Colleen

    Moderator
    Are you talking to Obama? Because he is the man who ran his first term without a budget and is now looking at another term without a budget, all the while refusing to cut government spending. He just spends, spends, spends, with not one ounce of care as to what it will do to this country once we default on the loan payments he took to cover HIS debt ceiling.
    By the way, I happen to agree with Sarah. That's saying a lot since I don't really care for her.


    Top contributors in Government category

     
    ROMOS
    Answers: 98 / Questions: 0
    Karma: 6525
     
    Benthere
    Answers: 19 / Questions: 0
    Karma: 5475
     
    jhharlan
    Answers: 61 / Questions: 1
    Karma: 3870
     
    Colleen
    Answers: 113 / Questions: 5
    Karma: 3765
    > Top contributors chart
    452308
    questions
    719720
    answers
    754207
    users