7 Answers

The girl was obviously troubled in other ways, the DJs certainly didn't help the situation, they will have to live with that, that is punishment enough IMO.

Simply put, no. Suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. The girl must have had other issues. Was a shame she picked-up the phone......

No. Nobody in his or her right mind would have thought that this would be the result, if indeed, this was the cause of her suicide. Millions of pranks are perpetrated every day and don't end this way. This one was relatively harmless, in and of itself, whereas the one in New Jersey was harmful (A college student taped another student engaged in a homosexual encounter, and this student committed suicide shortly thereafter).

I don't think that those who prancked Kate Midleton's nurse can be accused legally for her suicide, but they must be feeling realy bad. 

Suicide is a personal choice, and often a selfish one at that.   Those DJs were cruel and ignorant,  as are most people who victimize others and call it "humor", but they aren't responsible for her death.

No ,just a juvinile prank gone wrong,as the nurse that picked the telephone up already had her problems,

I have seen many similar events supporting a guilt conviction for a variety of improbable coincidences. Were someone to attack a “protected” person in a prank with no open means to counter, then the perpetrator,  is often blamed for a contrived, if not factual tragedy,  as a repercussion to their attack. Although such coincidental may, in fact occur, the result of shielding the protected person is upheld and other pranksters are dutifully fore-warned.