close
    what right have people ever reserved under the 10th Ammendment after it was ratified?

    States reserve 10th Ammendment rights by voting them into existence then publishing them in state registers and noticing U.S. govt. what rights wre reserved.   When states  fail to  protect people from problems with U.S. govt.,the people side of the 10th Ammendment is activated.  Only 10th Ammendment standing people can reserve 10th Ammendment rights.  Everyone today is seen through lens of law and court as a U.S. citizen governed under 14th Ammendment.  Founders never existed under the 14th nor were ever a U.S. citizen,in law or fact. Its what creates presumption of law 10th Ammendment is dead. States can't claim U.S. citizens as being state people.  Thus republican form of govt. is abandoned. No state republics. No true people relative to original Founding contract with U.S. govt.  Searching for one right reserved evidences truth.

    +2  Views: 577 Answers: 2 Posted: 12 years ago

    2 Answers

    The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads:

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.

    Ratified in 1791, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution embodies the general principles of FEDERALISM in a republican form of government. The Constitution specifies the parameters of authority that may be exercised by the three branches of the federal government: executive, legislative, and judicial. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states all powers that are not granted to the federal government by the Constitution, except for those powers that states are constitutionally forbidden from exercising.

    For example, nowhere in the federal Constitution is Congress given authority to regulate local matters concerning the health, safety, and morality of state residents. Known as POLICE POWERS, such authority is reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment. Conversely, no state may enter into a treaty with a foreign government because such agreements are prohibited by the plain language of Article I to the Constitution.

    We already had a civil war where this was one of the items fought over. Do we need to have another one?



    Top contributors in Uncategorized category

     
    ROMOS
    Answers: 18061 / Questions: 154
    Karma: 1101K
     
    Colleen
    Answers: 47270 / Questions: 115
    Karma: 953K
     
    country bumpkin
    Answers: 11322 / Questions: 160
    Karma: 838K
     
    Benthere
    Answers: 2392 / Questions: 30
    Karma: 760K
    > Top contributors chart

    Unanswered Questions

    discussion board post
    Answers: 0 Views: 22 Rating: 0
    coreconstrution
    Answers: 0 Views: 12 Rating: 0
    8xbetfaith
    Answers: 0 Views: 11 Rating: 0
    sunwinnit
    Answers: 0 Views: 13 Rating: 0
    OK
    Answers: 0 Views: 11 Rating: 0
    gmtoto88
    Answers: 0 Views: 11 Rating: 0
    > More questions...
    452922
    questions
    719975
    answers
    757097
    users